Jonathan Simon quoted by Daily Journal (registration required), Nov. 7, 2016
“If we actually step up and start investing more in rehabilitation, we can use this good time credit accelerator system to really push people out at the time that they pose little risk to the community, and there’s very little value in incarcerating them,” Simon said.
Jonathan Simon quoted by Vox, August 22, 2016
“At the end of the day, the ability of courts to control the level of incarceration is relatively weak compared to legislatures who can change the underlying sentencing structure,” Simon warns. But one thing the Court can do is raise the cost of incarceration by insisting upon prisoners’ rights to humane conditions.
Jonathan Simon interviewed by San Francisco Chronicle, July 23, 2016
“The media has been giving all of these events, especially Dallas and Baton Rouge, assassination-level coverage, like with President Kennedy or Martin Luther King Jr.,” Simon said. “And that exacerbates things — the rhetoric, the emotions. If we give that much space to shootings, let’s give the same space to discussion of policing, to real grievances, to why these shootings are happening.”
Jonathan Simon quoted in Daily Journal (registration required), July 14, 2016
“We’re talking about parole consideration, not a guaranteed exit,” Simon said. “The amendment is not very specific about how the parole process will be carried out, but the nature of parole is a focus on the individual and their risk to public safety, and parole has the discretion to deny.”
Jonathan Simon interviewed by Salon, Feb. 21, 2016
“Scalia was perhaps the strongest opponent of proportionality analysis of any kind under the Amendment,” emails Jonathan Simon. … “A more robust proportionality rule would go a long way to eliminating some outsized determinate sentences that drive a big part of mass incarceration.”
Jonathan Simon quoted in Daily Journal (registration required), Oct. 19, 2015
UC Berkeley law professor Jonathan Simon would like to see drug courts’ best features integrated into the justice system as a whole, rather than confined to a specialized sub-system. “If we’re now in an era when there’s possibilities for rescaling our ambitions for what the criminal process ought to handle, then I think that drug courts might be part of the problem,” Simon said.
Jonathan Simon quoted in The New York Times, July 30, 2015
“The benefit of being able to hold police accountable in many situations where they are now largely immune is probably worth the cost alone,” said Jonathan Simon. “But even more so when you consider how often the same cameras will provide damning evidence against criminal suspects as well.”
Jonathan Simon quoted in The New York Times, March 20, 2015
“As a group, police chiefs have always been more progressive than the rank-and-file, and it’s not all that clear that chiefs are going to be successful in carrying the rank-and-file with them,” Professor Simon said.
Jonathan Simon interviewed by Slate, March 18, 2015
“Does the Eighth Amendment just prevent torture, or does it protect something more? If it just protects us against torture then obviously it’s a very limited right, and we have to wait until things get really awful in prisons before courts are going to do anything. But if torture is just being protected against because it’s one way to destroy and degrade ‘human dignity,’ then I think almost everything we do in prison has to be rethought.”
Jonathan Simon interviewed by Slate, March 4, 2015
Many crimes are legally considered violent “even if no force is used, let alone injury suffered,” said Jonathan Simon. “Violence is a much more capacious legal category than most people assume.”