Steven Davidoff Solomon

A history of misses for RadioShack

Steven Davidoff Solomon writes for The New York Times, September 16, 2014

RadioShack could have been Best Buy. It could have been Amazon. It could have become Dell. The paths that RadioShack could have taken are numerous. But instead of choosing one, it chose them all, walking away from its place as a hobbyist’s dream.

Keeping corporate lawyers silent can shelter wrongdoing

Steven Davidoff Solomon writes for The New York Times, August 26, 2014

The result is that companies have a great incentive to shift anything hinting at legal trouble to their in-house counsel to ensure that it is protected from disclosure. The in-house legal department thus becomes the “cover-up and damage control” arm of the company.

In real estate listings deal with Zillow, Trulia bears most of the risk

Steven Davidoff Solomon writes for The New York Times, July 31, 2014

The bargain the two competitors struck is completely in Zillow’s favor. It permits the company to walk away from the transaction if regulators take any step to limit the combined company on antitrust grounds. Not only that, the parties agreed to severely limit what Trulia can do in the operation of its business until the deal closes or is terminated.

Changing old antitrust thinking for a new gilded age

Steven Davidoff Solomon writes for The New York Times, July 22, 2014

This test of competition is rooted in notions of how companies competed more than 100 years ago. Even after a merger of Time Warner and 21st Century Fox, there would still be three or four big competitors. Indeed, it may even be that the competition among them for consumers is fierce. This calculus, however, excludes the political and other power that a concentrated industry can wield with government and regulators.