This is one reason why places like Ferguson and Baltimore have become explosive

Richard Rothstein writes for History News Network, April 29, 2015

It was not a vague white society that created ghettos but government—federal, state, and local—that employed explicitly racial laws, policies, and regulations to ensure that black Americans would live impoverished, and separately from whites. Baltimore’s ghetto was not created by private discrimination, income differences, personal preferences, or demographic trends, but by purposeful action of government in violation of the Fifth, Thirteenth, and Fourteenth Amendments.

Berkeley events examine impact of Nuremberg trials

Kenneth Bamberger quoted in Daily Journal (registration required), April 28, 2015

The event, which kicked off Monday, comes at a “profoundly relevant time” because the last remaining Holocaust survivors and Nazis will likely all be dead within a decade, said Kenneth Bamberger. … “Soon there will be physically no one left to talk about this major crime.”

At high court, a new era on death penalty

Elisabeth Semel quoted in Daily Journal (registration required), April 28, 2015

“It’s important to be cautious about talking of a sea change at the Supreme Court, but in the broader view there is a very concrete acknowledgement that it’s important to explore how influenced jurors are by arguments that defendants will be a danger. This issue of future dangerousness if the defendant is not put to death is on the minds of jurors, and the court is really underscoring how decisive that argument can be.”

Community policing through exercise in East Palo Alto ‘Fit Zones’

Sarah Lawrence interviewed by KQED-FM, April 27, 2015

“We looked at a few years of data after the Fit Zones had started and looked at the levels of shootings in the city overall—in the two areas that have Fit Zones. Then we compared it to some places that did not have Fit Zones. We found that there was actually a statistically significance decline in shootings after the introduction of Fit Zones.”

We’re on a slippery slope toward a totally monitored world

James Rule writes for Los Angeles Times, April 27, 2015

You don’t need to be a conspiracy theorist to foresee a Faustian bargain—consent to a totally monitored world—emerging from these trends. Our greatest concern should not be unauthorized access to our data, but access by interests rightfully entitled to exploit any data known to exist.

Rationale for lethal injection as ‘human’ form of death is illogical

Megan McCracken and Jennifer Moreno write for The National Law Journal, April 27, 2015

To the extent the states’ actions can be explained by a common ­denominator, it is expediency. The actual “earnest desire” at work is not a more humane manner of death, but a different goal: to carry out executions without disruption. States design their execution procedures based on which drugs are available, not serious medical or scientific inquiry.

Drop in crime offers hope of cost cuts

Franklin Zimring and Barry Krisberg cited in UT San Diego, April 24, 2015

Zimring: Because of prison realignment (to county jails) and other policies in response to federal prison overcrowding orders, California has undertaken “a pretty substantial experiment in decarceration,” he added, and yet crime just keeps falling.

Krisberg says many Republicans—typically leaders of the law-and-order coalition—now often back changes that help reduce costs and incarceration rates, even as some Democrats oppose them because of their closeness to the prison guards and police unions.