In DuPont fight, activist investor picks a strong target

Steven Davidoff Solomon writes for The New York Times, January 27, 2015

DuPont is a 200-year-old company with a $65 billion market value and more than 58,000 employees. Trian is only its fifth-largest shareholder, according to Standard & Poor’s CapitalIQ. But just because a company is big does not necessarily mean that an activist will not strike.

Supreme Court to review Oklahoma lethal injection procedure

Megan McCracken quoted by CNN, January 24, 2015

“What’s at issue here is the use of midazolam and whether it is at all appropriate for execution,” said McCracken. “There have only been three executions where the prisoner was not paralyzed after the administration of mid and all three went horribly awry, raising serious concerns about the drug and whether it allows humane execution.”

BART may drop protest charges

Jonathan Simon quoted in San Francisco Gate, January 24, 2015

“A society that places a value on public demonstrations, of which civil disobedience will be a part, should be cautious about going down that road” of requiring protesters to pay financial costs, Simon said. “Every demonstration will have very disruptive effects on business,” generally covered by insurance.

Improving customer access to energy data can cut costs, protect environment

Ethan Elkind quoted on Phys.org, January 23, 2015

“Facilitating access to energy and market data—which can now be anonymized and aggregated without compromising customer privacy—can enable a host of more efficient and cleaner energy solutions, while also making it more economical for California to reach Gov. Brown’s climate change goals.”

Abortion law: Roe was right, but McRae was wrong

Jill Adams and Jessica Arons write for Ms., January 22, 2015

It is because of the court’s quick retreat in McRae from its own precedent in Roe that the debate around abortion rights has lingered for so long, flaring up with every new federal and state limit and every lawsuit challenging them. In short, it is largely because of McRae that Roe is no longer a reality for so many women and, frankly, hasn’t been for years.

Supreme Court trims federal appeals court’s authority in patent cases

Peter Menell quoted in Daily Journal (registration required), January 21, 2015

“This decision creates a clear pathway for better information to enter the record in patent cases and for more sound claim construction decisions,” Menell said. “Many district judges have not taken expert testimony on the record, nor have they provided detailed explanations for why they construe a claim one way or another.”