-The Wall Street Journal, June 17, 2011 by John Yoo
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304186404576389474268093278.html
By accusing President Barack Obama of violating the War Powers Resolution, House Republicans are abandoning their party’s longstanding position that the Constitution allows the executive to use force abroad, subject to Congress’s control over funding. Sadly, they’ve fallen victim to the siren song of short-term political gain.
-The Heritage Foundation Pt I, June 20, 2011 by John Yoo and James C. Ho
http://bit.ly/llpRFl
Much of the debate over the power to initiate hostilities focuses on understanding the meaning of the words, “declare War.” Supporters of presidential authority contend that the Founders were well aware of the long British practice of undeclared wars. They assert that the Constitution likewise does not require formal war declarations for the President to authorize hostilities as a matter of domestic constitutional power.
-The Heritage Foundation Pt II, June 20, 2011 by John Yoo and James C. Ho
http://bit.ly/m9dGgr
Few constitutional issues have been so consistently and heatedly debated by legal scholars and politicians in recent years as the distribution of war powers between Congress and the President. As a matter of history and policy, it is generally accepted that the executive takes the lead in the actual conduct of war.