Trump administration breaks human rights traditions in border patrol beating death case

Roxanna Altholz quoted by All Gov, Aug. 16, 2017

Altholz said the United States faces “high political costs for that failure” to respond to the petition. …  “One need only to look at the newspapers to understand how regional leadership in human rights is particularly important right now,” Altholz said. “To be very simple, the United States will lose the case, and lose it badly.”

Legal experts skeptical Trump can unilaterally subsidize Appalachian coal

John Yoo quoted by The Daily Caller, Aug. 15, 2017

“There could be existing statutes that provide for subsidies for industries that are harmed by unfair trade competition or that are advancing innovative techniques for energy development,” said Yoo. … “If no existing statute exists creating the program, then President Trump will have to ask Congress for new funds this upcoming year.”

An honest conversation about race is not allowed

Ian Haney López cited by The Washington Post, Aug. 14, 2017

There are so many dog whistles that a whole book was written about the practice by University of California at Berkeley law professor Ian Haney López, apparently to help the left decipher secret messages without the decoder rings distributed to the right.

With ambiguity and euphemism, extremists are showing their skill in bending words

Ian Haney López quoted by Boston Globe, Aug. 14, 2017

“When you use a phrase like ‘free speech’ to mobilize those who are racially fearful, it switches the conversation. It pretends that the conversation is about the right to express unpopular views — which is a quintessential American value that is enshrined in our Constitution — when in fact, the dynamic is about the expression of ugly views of racial prejudice,’’ Lopez said.

Twitter, Facebook users name and shame white nationalists in Charlottesville rally

Christopher Hoofnagle quoted by The Mercury News, Aug. 14, 2017

“We have very strong protections for our speech and a right to assembly against our government, but virtually no protection against private retaliation for free speech,” he said. … “This is all about private censorship and shame,” Hoofnagle said. “If you’re willing to accept it as OK, then think about what this would mean if this were done to you.”

Berkeley professor aims to eliminate natural hair bans in schools

Angela Onwuachi-Willig cited by Ebony, Aug. 11, 2017

“What’s troubling is that banning these hairstyles essentially tells Black girls and women … that the hair they were born with is faddish, extreme, distracting, and unprofessional. It sets up a standard that appears neutral in its language but is actually racially discriminatory.”

Politicians blocking people on social media ignites debate

Erwin Chemerinsky quoted by Fox Business, Aug. 10, 2017

Lower court rulings say the government can’t deny credentials to journalists because their reporting is critical, he said. “These are government officials communicating about government business. They can’t pick or choose based on who they like or who likes them,” Chemerinsky said.

Google uproar highlights questions over what you can or cannot say at work

Victoria Plaut quoted by The Wall Street Journal, Aug. 8, 2017

Victoria Plaut … suggested that companies can enhance their internal message boards with more-structured environments where difficult conversations can take place. … “Google could use this as a learning opportunity-both to reflect on how the climate is experienced by all employees and to pinpoint sources of resistance to its initiatives,” said Ms. Plaut.