Republicans begin to repeal Obama’s environmental legacy

Ethan Elkind quoted by Colorlines, Feb. 2, 2017

“By removing these regulations, you’re removing protections for clean air, clean water,” said Ethan Elkind. … “It’s safe to say that every time you remove environmental protection, very often communities of color and disadvantaged communities are most at risk, because they’re closer to those industrial facilities that these regulations are designed to limit pollution and other harmful health effects from.”

100 years and 16 presidents ago, a look at another anti-immigration act

Taeku Lee quoted by USA Today, Feb. 2, 2017

Taeku Lee … said he senses a similar nativist sentiment today that is driven by a mix of demographic changes, economic insecurity and anxieties about national security. “Today’s fantasied scourge of ‘aliens’ from south of the border and terrorists cloaked in the garb of refugees is the Yellow Peril of the late 19th and early 20th century,” Lee said.

Liberal UC Berkeley law professor Dan Farber on Neil Gorsuch

Daniel Farber quoted by The Washington Post, Feb. 2, 2017

“Based on what we know so far, trying to stall Neil Gorsuch’s nomination seems wrong on principle. I say that as someone who fervently supported Merrick Garland and found the GOP blockade of his nomination appalling. It’s understandable that many Democrats think it would be only fair to return the same treatment. But I think it would be wrong.”

In Calif., Gorsuch pick greeted with concern, pragmatism

Daniel Farber quoted by The Recorder (registration required), Feb. 1, 2017

UC Berkeley law professor Daniel Farber called the Gorsuch pick “a surprisingly reasonable choice for Trump.” Farber, who clerked at the U.S. Supreme Court for former Justice John Paul Stevens, said that Gorsuch looks “principled enough and like he’s got enough backbone to rule against Trump when he goes over the line.”

What could Gorsuch mean for the Supreme Court: A good option for Democrats

Daniel Farber writes for Politico Magazine, Feb. 1, 2017

The key thing about Gorsuch from my point of view is that he’s principled—and he seems to have enough backbone to stand up to Trump. We could use that on the court. The fact that Gorsuch has spoken against judicial deference to the executive branch in matters of statutory interpretation makes it more likely that he won’t rubber-stamp Trump’s actions.

Breitbart editor’s college grant for white men draws fire

Ian Haney López quoted by CNBC, Feb. 1, 2017

UC Berkeley law professor Ian Haney Lopez said Wednesday that affirmative action programs were undertaken “to welcome historically excluded and dehumanized groups into every school, neighborhood and workplace. Affirmative action for white men is not social repair. Affirmative action for white men is a stunt to mock the moral and social importance of integration and to increase social strife,” he told CNBC.