What could Gorsuch mean for the Supreme Court?

Daniel Farber writes for Politico Magazine, Feb. 1, 2017

Gorsuch wrote a clear, persuasive opinion in favor of upholding the renewable energy law. What I have read about his other opinions—and what I have heard from colleagues who knew him at earlier points in his life—reinforces my view that he is a thoughtful, principled judge, albeit one who is more conservative than I would like.

Trump nominates Neil Gorsuch to fill Supreme Court vacancy

John Yoo quoted by Las Vegas Review Journal, Jan. 31, 2017

The Gorsuch nomination “is a great pick and a safe pick,” former George W. Bush attorney John Yoo opined. “It’s the most conservative person who could get confirmed. It’s very hard to see how the left is going to ‘Bork’ him,” said Yoo, now a University of California, Berkeley law professor, in a reference to the harsh vetting that killed the 1987 nomination of Judge Robert Bork.

White House says ‘No American citizen will ever be targeted’ after 8-year-old girl dies in Yemen

John Yoo quoted by US News & World Report, Jan. 31, 2017

“This is a big mistake,” Yoo says. “Such a policy would prevent the U.S. from targeting Anwar al-Awlaki, for example. It would create a force field around any U.S. citizen who joins al-Qaida or ISIS. Al-Qaida and ISIS leaders would immediately start recruiting Americans, even more heavily than now, and placing them in leadership positions.”

Trump’s order on new regulations tightens reins on EPA

Daniel Farber quoted by Law360, Jan. 30, 2017

“I think what the order really does is make it nearly impossible to do new regulations. Or at least new regulations that aren’t mandated by law by a certain deadline. And the administration didn’t want to do any new regulations anyway,” said Dan Farber.

Mr. President, use a litmus test to choose your Supreme Court nominee

John Yoo co-writes for Los Angeles Times, Jan. 29, 2017

The president should focus like a laser on judicial philosophy. Trump must nominate a justice based on his view of the proper interpretation of the Constitution. The oath he swore —  to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States” — means that just as he wouldn’t sign an unconstitutional bill, he must not nominate a judge who holds views at odds with the Constitution.