Whistleblowing is the ultimate form of burning your bridges. So it comes as no surprise that while whistleblowers are lauded for their courage and willingness to call out their companies for material financial wrongdoing, the celebration pales in comparison to the common risks they face from their current and future employers. Whistleblowers are often mishandled, ignored, and their allegations lead to job terminations and being blacklisted from other prospective companies in the industry. In response, a new group seeks to change this recurring story.
Reinforcements Arrive for Whistleblowers in Financial Services
Recap: A Conversation with Sean McKessy, Chief of the SEC Whistleblower Office
On November 5, 2014, the Berkeley Center for Law, Business and the Economy (BCLBE) welcomed Sean McKessy, Chief of the SEC’s Office of the Whistleblower, to Boalt Hall for a talk on the whistleblower program and its three main aspects: confidentiality, anti-retaliation protection and payouts.
Supreme Court Holds SOX Whistleblower Law Protects Employees of Private Contractors; Yet Full Scope Remains Unclear
On March 4, 2014, the United States Supreme Court held in Lawson v. FMR LLC, 571 U.S. __ , Case No. 12-3 (Mar. 4, 2014), that §806 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“SOX”) provides a cause of action for employees of private contractors and subcontractors that are retaliated against for whistleblowing activities.
SEC Forecasts an Increase in Whistleblower Cases and Awards
[Editor’s Note: The following post is authored by Goodwin Procter LLP]
On June 12, 2013, the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission announced its second-ever whistleblower award under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank”). Having received over 3,000 whistleblower tips in the first year of the revamped program, the SEC made its first whistleblower award in August of 2012 and is expected to issue an increasing number of awards in the coming months. (more…)
Johnson, Sylvester, Funke, oh my!: The ARB Paves the Way for Greater SOX Whistleblower Protection
Earlier this year, The Network reported on some changes made to the Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) whistleblower provisions by the enactment of the Dodd-Frank bill. In recent months, the Administrative Review Board (ARB) – the appeals board for decision issued by Administrative Law Judges in the Department of Labor – has made monumental transformations to existing case law regarding whistleblower retaliation claims. The alterations the ARB has made are a clear departure from previous SOX whistleblower case law and revitalized whistleblowing as a public service deserving of protection.
Under 18 U.S.C. § 1514A, it is illegal for any public company subject to SOX to discharge employees, contractors, subcontractors or agents for informing certain entities about certain enumerated SOX violations. If an employee suspects that retaliatory acts were taken against them for their role in reporting a SOX violation, the employee must file a complaint with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) within 180 days of the retaliatory act – increased from 90 days by Section 922(b) of the Dodd-Frank Act. After OSHA conducts an investigation, it issues an initial decision. If either party disputes OSHA’s decision, that party may appeal to the Department of Labor Office of Administrative Law Judges. There, the purported whistleblower must establish a prima facie case for SOX protection. In order to establish a prima facie case, the claimant must prove (1) he or she engaged in SOX protected activity, (2) the respondent took unfavorable employment actions against complainant, and (3) the protected activity was a contributing factor to the adverse action.